The Intersection of
Cultural Determinism and Compatibilism
After studying the
various perspectives on the types of determinism, free will, and compatibilism,
I found myself agreeing most with the doctrine of cultural determinism. As it
stated in the article, cultural determinism is the belief that we are the
“products of our immediate culture.” When considering cultural determinism, I
started thinking about all the various aspects of a culture that could exert
influence over our everyday choices and actions, and the list was endless:
family, friends, social media, music, art, film, etc. From birth, your nuclear
family and close set of friends are the primary way you learn the values and
essential Truths that you will carry with you throughout your life and that
inform your personality and decision making. I also thoroughly agreed with the
example in the text that showed that the cultural values and influences that
are passed on vary widely between cultures. For example, the cultural values
that are important to me are my education at Belmont, obtaining my degree, and
landing a good job on Music Row. However, while visiting an extremely poor
village in Mexico over the summer, I realized the values that the culture held
most dear were each individual’s ability to create handmade goods to sell in
the marketplace, and survival in general. Overall, my beliefs lie in an
intersection between cultural determinism and compatibilism. I believe that the
many facets of our culture are so prominent in our everyday lives that they
play a large role in shaping our character and personality, and thus the
choices that we ultimately make. However, I do not believe that cultural
influence completely takes the place of free will. I agree with the studies
that state that the ability to make choices at free will is an innately human
characteristic, and without it, we lose a large part of what it means to be
human.
In my opinion,
both cultural determinism and compatibilism have their strengths and weakness.
In cultural determinism, it accounts for the influence of newer technologies
like social media that other theories widely ignore, as well as larger
socioeconomic forces such as politics and the economy. However, it creates the
notion that we can become completely brainwashed by cultural phenomenon to the
point where they are our only basis for decision-making. When thinking about
compatibilism, I believe the theory holds more merit because it serves as a
type of middle-ground that allows for some of our bigger life choices and
events to be pre-determined, but also allows the belief that humans have the
intellectual capacity to exercise free will after surveying various options.
The ability to exercise free will is necessary in order to not only take moral
responsibility, as noted in the article, but also to make lasting changes on
the society in which we live in. As Madeleine Albright put it, “What people
have the capacity to choose, they have the ability to change.”
Your final quote from M. Albright is actually a thoughtful acknowledgement of Compatibilism. It assumes that some things you can't choose but those things you can choose have the potential to bring change. I'll be curious to see if you work on that angle some more in future blogs.
ReplyDelete