The movie Source Code was very
interesting to me and throughout the movie there were many tough decisions that
needed to be made. With every decision that was made I instantly thought about
which classic category was being used and what decision I would have made if I
were in the movie.
The
biggest decision that had to be made in the whole movie was for Commander
Goodwin to disobey her boss Dr. Rutledge and keep Captain Stevens alive so he
can save more lives or keep her promise and terminate Captain Steven’s life
after his last mission.
Dr.
Rutledge believed that if they kept Captain Stevens alive then he could go on
more missions and save thousands if not millions of more lives. This
decision-making by him would be considered Utilitarianism
decision-making, which is a sub category of consequential ethics.
Utilitarianism “argues that an act is
morally right if the total good of an action is more favorable than unfavorable
to everyone involved”. I believe Dr. Rutledge was in the right with this decision-making,
because thousands of lives are far more important than one life. At the same
time I do not feel like there is a right or wrong way of making this type of
decision, because Commander Goodwin made a promise to Captain Stevens and knew
that he was going through a lot of pain during each eight-minute mission and
felt like it was her duty to fulfill Captain Stevens last request made and that
was to terminate his life after his last mission.
Making someone else suffer to save
more lives is the decision that I would make, but other people have different
thoughts about this type of decision and I do not think they are wrong for
their decisions because we are all different. This thought process is easy for
me to say, because I am not the one suffering, but I feel like I would be
strong enough to be able to know that I am making a sacrifice to save many more
lives.
Overall the decision in the movie to
either terminate Captain Steven’s life or to keep him alive and have the
potential of saving millions more was very difficult for Commander Goodwin as
is should be. Making a decision that involves someone living or not must be
very hard to do, however I feel like the lives of thousands of people are far
more important than a single persons life, no matter who they are or what they
have done in their lives. At the same time I do believe that it is not my decision
to choose whether or not someone should live, and that choice should be up to
themselves and no one else because, no one knows what they are going through
except for the person themselves.
Your blog made it clear that you favor consequentialism/utilitarianism as the ethical theory of choice.
ReplyDelete